Tell us about a time when you had to resolve a conflict between a patient and their family over treatment decisions.

INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
Tell us about a time when you had to resolve a conflict between a patient and their family over treatment decisions.
Sample answer to the question:
One time, I had to resolve a conflict between a patient and their family over treatment decisions. The patient's family wanted to pursue a more aggressive treatment option, while the patient preferred a more conservative approach. I listened carefully to both sides, acknowledging their concerns and validating their perspectives. I then facilitated a meeting with the patient, their family, and the medical team to discuss the available options and their potential risks and benefits. Through open and empathetic communication, I was able to help the family understand the patient's wishes and respect their autonomy. Together, we reached a consensus on a treatment plan that balanced the patient's preferences and the best medical evidence.
Here is a more solid answer:
In a recent experience, I encountered a conflict between a patient and their family over treatment decisions. The patient's family strongly advocated for an aggressive treatment option, while the patient expressed a desire for a more conservative approach. As a Gastroenterology Nurse Practitioner, it was my responsibility to navigate this sensitive situation. To address the conflict, I initiated a series of individual meetings with both the patient and their family. I listened attentively to their concerns, validating their emotions and perspectives. I then scheduled a joint meeting, inviting the patient, their family, and the healthcare team to discuss the treatment options in detail. During this meeting, I facilitated an open and respectful dialogue, ensuring that everyone had an opportunity to express their viewpoints. I provided evidence-based information, explaining the risks, benefits, and potential outcomes of each option. Gradually, I could bridge the gap between the patient's wishes and the family's concerns. Through empathetic communication and active listening, I helped the family understand the patient's values and preferences. We ultimately reached a consensus on a treatment plan that incorporated the patient's autonomy and respected the expertise of the medical team.
Why is this a more solid answer?
The solid answer provides more specific details about the conflict and the candidate's role in resolving it. It also highlights the candidate's ability to initiate individual meetings and facilitate a joint meeting to address the conflict. However, it can still be improved by providing more information on the specific treatment options discussed and the outcome of the conflict resolution.
An example of a exceptional answer:
I recall a challenging situation where I had to navigate a conflict between a patient and their family over treatment decisions. The patient's family strongly advocated for an experimental treatment option, believing it would provide a miracle cure, while the patient leaned towards a more conservative approach backed by scientific evidence. As a Gastroenterology Nurse Practitioner, my role was to serve as a mediator and advocate for both the patient's autonomy and the family's emotional needs. To address the conflict, I conducted individual meetings with the patient, their family, and the healthcare team to gather a comprehensive understanding of everyone's perspectives and concerns. I presented evidence-based research on alternative treatment options and engaged in deep discussions, using a mix of empathy, active listening, and open-mindedness. Recognizing the family's emotional distress and the patient's desire for thoughtful decision-making, I suggested a family therapy session facilitated by a trained psychologist. This session allowed the family to express their fears and hopes while the patient felt heard and supported. Ultimately, the family's trust in my expertise and the collaborative approach enabled them to accept the patient's decision for a conservative treatment plan. This experience taught me the importance of teamwork, emotional intelligence, and the power of effective communication in resolving conflicts.
Why is this an exceptional answer?
The exceptional answer provides a more detailed account of the conflict, including the specific treatment options involved. It also highlights the candidate's exceptional problem-solving skills by suggesting a family therapy session facilitated by a psychologist. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of emotional intelligence and effective communication in conflict resolution. This answer demonstrates the candidate's ability to handle complex situations and utilize resources beyond their immediate scope of practice.
How to prepare for this question:
  • Familiarize yourself with common conflicts that can arise between patients and their families in the context of treatment decisions.
  • Develop a thorough understanding of evidence-based treatment options for gastrointestinal disorders to facilitate informed discussions with patients and their families.
  • Practice active listening and empathy to effectively address emotional concerns and validate perspectives.
  • Consider seeking additional training or workshops on conflict resolution and mediation techniques.
  • Prepare examples from past experiences where you successfully navigated conflicts and reached consensus.
  • Reflect on your own values and ethics related to patient autonomy and decision-making to strengthen your ability to advocate for patients.
What are interviewers evaluating with this question?
  • Communication and interpersonal skills
  • Ability to work collaboratively in a multidisciplinary team environment

Want content like this in your inbox?
Sign Up for our Newsletter

By clicking "Sign up" you consent and agree to Jobya's Terms & Privacy policies

Related Interview Questions