Tell me about a time when you faced resistance or skepticism towards your research findings. How did you handle it?

SENIOR LEVEL

Sample answer to the question:

In one of my previous research projects, I encountered resistance from some colleagues when I presented my findings. I handled it by first listening to their concerns and understanding their perspective. Then, I took the time to explain the methodology and data analysis techniques I used in detail, addressing any misconceptions. I provided additional evidence from peer-reviewed publications to support my findings. I also emphasized the significance of my research and how it contributes to the field of epidemiology. Through open and respectful communication, I was able to build trust and credibility with my colleagues, and eventually, they acknowledged the validity of my research findings.

Here is a more solid answer:

During a research project on the impact of a public health intervention, I faced resistance from some stakeholders who doubted the effectiveness of the intervention based on their prior experiences. To address their skepticism, I organized a meeting to present my findings and engage in a constructive discussion. I started by highlighting the goals of the intervention and the methodology used to evaluate its impact. Using statistical software, I analyzed the data collected and demonstrated a significant reduction in the targeted health outcome. I explained the significance of the findings in terms of public health impact and how they align with established theories. Additionally, I shared success stories and testimonials from individuals who benefited from the intervention. By providing a holistic and data-driven narrative, I was able to alleviate the stakeholders' skepticism and gain their support for the intervention.

Why is this a more solid answer?

This is a solid answer because it includes specific details about the research project, such as the topic (impact of a public health intervention) and the targeted health outcome. The candidate demonstrates their proficiency in statistical analysis by mentioning their use of statistical software and data analysis. They also showcase their leadership skills by organizing a meeting and engaging stakeholders in a constructive discussion. However, the answer could be further improved by discussing the candidate's role in leading and managing the research project, as well as their experience in project management.

An example of a exceptional answer:

As the lead epidemiologist for a large-scale population study, I encountered significant resistance from the scientific community when I presented our findings at a national conference. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between environmental factors and the prevalence of a specific disease. Many attendees expressed skepticism due to the novelty of our approach and the absence of similar studies. To address their resistance, I prepared a comprehensive presentation that included detailed information about the study design, data collection methods, and statistical analysis techniques. I also highlighted the extensive expertise of our multidisciplinary research team. During the Q&A session, I confidently addressed each question and critique, providing additional evidence from our research as well as supporting studies in related fields. I emphasized the importance of our findings in advancing the understanding of the disease and its implications for public health interventions. By the end of the conference, the initial skepticism had transformed into admiration, and several attendees expressed interest in collaborating on future research projects.

Why is this an exceptional answer?

This is an exceptional answer because it goes above and beyond in providing specific details about the research project, such as the goal (to investigate the relationship between environmental factors and disease prevalence) and the scale of the study (large-scale population study). The candidate demonstrates their advanced knowledge of epidemiological methods and designs by mentioning the novelty of their approach and the absence of similar studies. They also showcase excellent verbal and written communication skills by preparing a comprehensive presentation and confidently addressing questions and critiques. Additionally, the candidate's leadership skills and experience in project management are evident through their role as the lead epidemiologist. The answer could be further improved by discussing the candidate's experience in mentoring and providing guidance to junior epidemiologists.

How to prepare for this question:

When preparing for this question, reflect on a specific research project where you faced resistance or skepticism towards your findings. Choose a project that aligns with the job requirements, such as one that involved complex study design and data analysis.

Focus on the steps you took to handle the resistance or skepticism. Emphasize your ability to effectively communicate the methodology and analysis techniques used in your research.

Highlight the significance of your findings in the field of epidemiology and their implications for public health interventions. Provide specific examples or evidence that support the validity and importance of your research.

Discuss any leadership roles or experience in project management related to the research project. Explain how you led and managed the project to overcome challenges and achieve positive outcomes.

Consider mentioning any collaboration or engagement with stakeholders during the research project, as this demonstrates your ability to work collaboratively and address concerns.

What are interviewers evaluating with this question?