Describe a situation where you faced a conflict within a multidisciplinary team. How did you resolve it?

SENIOR LEVEL
Describe a situation where you faced a conflict within a multidisciplinary team. How did you resolve it?
Sample answer to the question:
In my previous role, I worked on a multidisciplinary team that included psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers. We had a conflict when it came to deciding on the best treatment approach for a patient struggling with addiction and co-occurring mental health conditions. Some team members believed medication-assisted treatment was the most effective option, while others advocated for a more holistic approach. To resolve the conflict, we held a team meeting where everyone had the opportunity to express their viewpoints and provide evidence supporting their preferred methods. We also invited an addiction specialist to provide expert advice. Through open and respectful communication, we were able to reach a consensus and develop an integrated treatment plan that incorporated both medication-assisted treatment and holistic interventions. This experience taught me the importance of active listening, collaboration, and compromise within a multidisciplinary team.
Here is a more solid answer:
During my time as an Addiction Nurse Practitioner, I encountered a conflict within a multidisciplinary team while developing a treatment plan for a patient with addiction and co-occurring mental health issues. The conflict arose from differing opinions on the use of medication-assisted treatment. Some team members believed in its effectiveness, while others were skeptical and preferred non-pharmacological interventions. To resolve the conflict, I took the initiative to organize a meeting with the team to discuss our concerns and perspectives. I presented evidence-based research supporting the efficacy of medication-assisted treatment in improving patient outcomes. At the same time, I actively listened to the concerns of the team members who advocated for non-pharmacological approaches. By fostering open and respectful communication, we were able to reach a consensus that integrated both medication-assisted treatment and non-pharmacological interventions into the patient's plan. This experience enhanced my collaboration and problem-solving skills, as I learned the importance of effectively presenting evidence, actively listening to team members, and finding common ground to provide comprehensive care.
Why is this a more solid answer?
The solid answer provides more specific details about the conflict and the candidate's actions to resolve it. It includes the candidate's role in organizing a meeting, presenting evidence-based research, and actively listening to team members. It also highlights the candidate's ability to collaborate and problem-solve effectively. However, it could still be improved by providing more information on the outcome of the treatment plan and the impact on the patient's recovery.
An example of a exceptional answer:
In my role as an Addiction Nurse Practitioner, there was a conflict within our multidisciplinary team concerning the treatment approach for a patient struggling with addiction and co-occurring mental health conditions. Some team members favored a strictly medication-based approach, while others believed in a more holistic approach that included therapy and support groups. To address the conflict, I sought to understand the perspectives of each team member by arranging individual meetings with them. These discussions allowed me to appreciate their expertise and concerns. I then proposed a compromise that combined medication-assisted treatment with therapy and support groups. I presented this plan to the team, emphasizing the evidence-based benefits of such an approach. To create a sense of ownership and ensure buy-in from all team members, I assigned specific responsibilities to each person based on their areas of expertise. Throughout the implementation of the treatment plan, I organized regular meetings to review progress, address any concerns, and make adjustments if needed. Ultimately, the patient responded positively to the integrated approach, showing improvement in both their addiction and mental health. This experience highlighted the importance of effective communication, compromise, and utilizing the strengths of each team member in resolving conflicts within a multidisciplinary team.
Why is this an exceptional answer?
The exceptional answer provides a detailed account of how the conflict was addressed by arranging individual meetings with team members, proposing a compromise, assigning responsibilities, and monitoring progress. It also emphasizes the positive outcome of the treatment plan and its impact on the patient's recovery. The answer demonstrates exceptional skills in communication, compromise, and utilizing the strengths of each team member. To further improve, the candidate could provide specific examples of how they utilized the expertise of team members and how the integrated approach contributed to the patient's overall well-being.
How to prepare for this question:
  • Research common conflicts that can arise within multidisciplinary teams and learn effective strategies to resolve them.
  • Reflect on past experiences where you had to collaborate with individuals from different disciplines and identify any conflicts that emerged.
  • Think about how you effectively communicated and collaborated with others to overcome those conflicts and achieve positive outcomes.
  • Consider how you can showcase your ability to integrate different perspectives and evidence-based approaches to provide comprehensive care for patients.
What are interviewers evaluating with this question?
  • Collaboration
  • Problem-solving

Want content like this in your inbox?
Sign Up for our Newsletter

By clicking "Sign up" you consent and agree to Jobya's Terms & Privacy policies

Related Interview Questions