What is your experience with version control tools like Git, and can you describe your workflow using them?

Sure, I've used Git a fair bit in my previous projects. It was a part of our everyday routine when coding. Most of the time, I'd start by pulling the latest changes using 'git pull' to make sure I'm up-to-date. Then, I'd work on my code, adding new features or fixing bugs. After testing my changes to make sure everything works, I'd do a 'git add' and 'git commit' to save my work. Finally, I'd push my changes with 'git push'. We also did code reviews using pull requests, which was a neat way to get feedback and ensure top-notch code quality.

In my previous role as a developer intern, version control with Git was central to maintaining an organized codebase and collaborating with my team. Each day started with a 'git pull' from our main branch to ensure my local repo was current. For new tasks, I'd create a feature branch using 'git checkout -b', keeping my work isolated and manageable. Once my feature was added or bug fixed, with thorough unit tests confirming functionality, I'd stage my changes with 'git add .' and make a comprehensible commit with 'git commit -m'. Before merging, I'd rebase onto the main branch to reduce conflicts, and then push my branch for review with 'git push'. My team used a thorough pull request review process to critique and enhance our code. This workflow hammered in the importance of communication and attention to detail to avoid snags.

I embrace version control as a crucial component of my development process, and Git has been my go-to tool. At my last internship, I adopted a feature-branch workflow to ensure my contributions were isolated and reversible. After an initial 'git pull' from the master branch each morning, I'd 'git checkout -b feature-x' to start my tasks. I committed frequently with descriptive messages to document the evolution of my code. Once I'd written tests and my features passed all checks, I ran 'git rebase master' to facilitate a clean integration. This preemptive step minimized merge conflicts and preserved a clear project history. We leveraged pull requests for peer reviews, which honed my code quality and fostered team discussion. Git was also instrumental during refactoring - the diff tool helped us assess changes meticulously, ensuring algorithmic optimizations didn't introduce errors. My contributions often included streamlining our Git hooks and educating peers on best practices, like atomic commits and interactive rebasing, thus continuously refining our collective workflow.