JUNIOR LEVEL

How would you proceed if you encountered an unexpected result during your research testing phase?

Sample answer to the question

Well, if I came across something unexpected in my testing, I'd first make sure it wasn't a mistake. I'd re-check the data and my code for errors. Then, if everything's fine, I'd look into the irregularity deeper, maybe run some more tests to confirm the results. I remember when I was working on a project in college where we were testing material durability and got some weird numbers. Turned out, it was an issue with the calculation method we were using. So yeah, being thorough is important.

A more solid answer

In the event of an unexpected result during research testing, I'd immediately verify the integrity of the data and the test setup. When I was working on my senior project, I came across a similar situation where a circuit's output deviated from the expected values. I meticulously reviewed the setup, recalibrated the equipment, and ran several control tests. After confirming the anomaly, I discussed it with my team to brainstorm potential causes. We hypothesized it could be due to an overlooked environmental variable, and sure enough, after isolating the tests further, we discovered it was electromagnetic interference. We adjusted our setup protocols and documented the finding in our project report, which later helped other students in their research.

Why this is a more solid answer:

The solid answer is more comprehensive as it includes collaboration by involving the team in brainstorming sessions and mentions documenting the findings, which addresses technical writing skills. It still lacks a clear reference to time management by not discussing how these steps are integrated into the project timeline. Additionally, while the answer mentions the specificity of the project and the resulting action, it could elaborate more on the broader implications for research procedures or industry practices.

An exceptional answer

Upon encountering unexpected results, my approach is systematic. I immediately double-check data, reconstruct the tests, and run control experiments, ensuring the integrity of the results. During my capstone project, I observed a signal anomaly that wasn't predicted by the simulations. Methodically, I replicated the experiment, solicited input from experts in my network, and engaged in a comprehensive literature review. After thorough analysis, I traced the anomaly to a software glitch that appeared under specific conditions. I drafted a detailed report, which outlined the methodologies, the unexpected findings, and our resolution process. Additionally, I included this discovery in our project roadmap, clearly communicating to stakeholders how this added a week to our timeline, thereby demonstrating effective time management. This meticulous documentation not only aided our project but also contributed to a wider research community knowledge.

Why this is an exceptional answer:

This exceptional answer goes further by including a systematic approach to addressing unexpected results, scrutinizing every aspect, seeking expert opinions, and undertaking a thorough literature review, which indicates critical thinking and a collaborative spirit. The answer clearly integrates time management by mentioning the impact on the project timeline and highlights technical writing through the drafting of a detailed report. Furthermore, the documentation effort is described as serving both the project and the research community, showing the candidate's awareness of the broader context and impact of their work.

How to prepare for this question

Prepare specific examples from past experiences where you've effectively managed unexpected results, highlighting your analytical and problem-solving skills.
Study research methodologies relevant to the engineering field to discuss how you apply standard protocols and adapt when faced with anomalies.
Practice explaining complex technical issues in simple terms. This will demonstrate your verbal communication and technical writing skills during the interview.
Think through past collaborative efforts, especially in academic or project settings, and be ready to discuss how teamwork played a key role in managing unexpected outcomes.
Brush up on your project management basics, including how to adjust timelines and communicate delays effectively, as time management is crucial in research settings.

What interviewers are evaluating

Data analysis
Critical thinking
Collaboration
Time management
Technical writing