/Content Editor/ Interview Questions
JUNIOR LEVEL

Have you ever had to deal with a difficult writer or contributor? How did you handle the situation?

Content Editor Interview Questions
Have you ever had to deal with a difficult writer or contributor? How did you handle the situation?

Sample answer to the question

Yes, I have dealt with difficult writers or contributors in the past. In one instance, I was working on a collaborative project with a writer who consistently missed deadlines and submitted subpar content. To handle the situation, I first reached out to the writer to express my concerns and understand any challenges they were facing. I offered my assistance and provided clear guidelines and expectations for the project. When the issues persisted, I escalated the situation to my supervisor, presenting them with evidence of the writer's performance. Together with my supervisor, we had a meeting with the writer to discuss the consequences of their actions and the impact it had on the project. Ultimately, we decided to assign the writer to a different project and bring in a more reliable contributor. This experience taught me the importance of open communication, setting expectations, and addressing performance issues promptly.

A more solid answer

Yes, I have encountered challenging situations while working with writers or contributors. For example, there was a project where a writer consistently missed deadlines and delivered content that did not meet our quality standards. To address this, I initiated a one-on-one conversation with the writer to understand their challenges and offer my support. I provided clear guidelines and expectations for the project, emphasizing the importance of meeting deadlines and maintaining quality. Despite these efforts, the writer's performance did not improve. I then raised the issue with my supervisor, presenting evidence of the writer's missed deadlines and subpar work. Together, we decided to reassign the writer to a project better aligned with their strengths and bring in a more reliable contributor. This decision helped us meet our deadlines and maintain the quality of the content. Reflecting on this experience, I learned the significance of proactive communication, setting clear expectations, and involving higher management when necessary to ensure project success.

Why this is a more solid answer:

The solid answer expands on the basic answer by providing more specific details about the challenging situation. The candidate describes their efforts to address the issue, such as initiating a conversation with the writer and providing clear guidelines. They also highlight the involvement of their supervisor and the outcome of their actions, which resulted in reassigning the writer and bringing in a more reliable contributor. However, the answer could still be improved by discussing the impact of the situation on the overall project and the candidate's learnings from it.

An exceptional answer

Indeed, I have faced several instances where I had to navigate difficult situations with writers or contributors. For instance, there was a project where a writer consistently missed deadlines and provided content that required significant revisions. To address this, I scheduled a meeting with the writer to discuss their challenges and understand their perspective. During the meeting, I actively listened to their concerns and offered practical solutions to help them meet deadlines and improve the quality of their work. Additionally, I introduced a feedback loop wherein we collaboratively reviewed and revised their drafts to ensure alignment with our standards. As a result, the writer started delivering content on time and with improved quality. This experience taught me the value of empathetic communication and actively involving contributors in the revision process. It reinforced my belief in nurturing relationships with difficult writers to help them grow professionally, fostering a more productive work environment.

Why this is an exceptional answer:

The exceptional answer goes above and beyond by providing even more specific examples and showcasing the candidate's problem-solving skills. They describe how they scheduled a meeting with the writer, actively listened to their concerns, and offered practical solutions to help improve their performance. The candidate also introduces a collaborative feedback loop, which resulted in the writer delivering content on time and with better quality. The answer demonstrates the candidate's empathy, adaptability, and ability to foster a productive work environment. However, it could be further enhanced by discussing the impact of the improved content on the project's success and the candidate's growth as a content editor.

How to prepare for this question

  • Reflect on past experiences where you have dealt with difficult writers or contributors. Consider the specific challenges you faced and the actions you took to address them.
  • Think about the importance of open communication in such situations. How did you ensure that the writer or contributor understood your concerns and the impact of their actions?
  • Consider any strategies or techniques you used to help the writer or contributor improve their performance. How did you provide guidance and support?
  • Reflect on the outcomes of the situations you have handled. Did the writer or contributor's performance improve? How did the overall project or team benefit from your actions?
  • Highlight the soft skills you utilized during these situations, such as empathy, active listening, and adaptability.

What interviewers are evaluating

  • Communication
  • Collaboration
  • Problem-solving
  • Adaptability
  • Attention to detail

Related Interview Questions

More questions for Content Editor interviews