Describe a time when you had to address a conflict or disagreement with a client during a therapy session. How did you handle it?

During a therapy session, I once had a disagreement with a client regarding the choice of sound therapy instrument to use. The client preferred the sound of tuning forks while I believed that singing bowls would be more effective for their specific needs. In order to address the conflict, I calmly listened to the client's concerns and explained the benefits of using singing bowls in their treatment. I also shared my expertise and knowledge about the specific healing properties of singing bowls. Ultimately, we reached a compromise where we started the session with tuning forks and gradually transitioned to singing bowls. By considering the client's preferences and needs, while also implementing my professional judgment, we were able to resolve the conflict and continue the therapy session in a collaborative and harmonious manner.

During a therapy session, I encountered a conflict with a client concerning the selection of a sound therapy instrument. The client expressed a preference for tuning forks, while I believed that gongs would be more beneficial. In order to handle the conflict, I utilized my active listening skills to truly understand the client's perspective and concerns. I empathized with their desire for tuning forks and acknowledged the validity of their preference. At the same time, I calmly explained the unique healing properties of gongs and how they could address the client's specific needs. By actively engaging in a respectful and open conversation, we were able to find common ground and agree to try both instruments during the session. This approach not only resolved the conflict but also strengthened the therapeutic alliance between myself and the client, leading to a more effective session.

Let me share a situation during a therapy session where I encountered a conflict with a client regarding the sound therapy technique to be used. The client had a strong preference for singing bowls, while I believed that tuning forks would be more appropriate for their condition. I handled the conflict by first practicing active listening, allowing the client to express their reasons for preferring singing bowls. I demonstrated patience and empathy, acknowledging their emotional attachment to this particular instrument. Then, I explained my professional judgment, highlighting the specific benefits of tuning forks in addressing their needs. I took the time to educate the client about the principles of sound therapy and how different instruments can achieve different therapeutic outcomes. Through open and clear communication, we were able to reach a shared understanding and agreed to incorporate both singing bowls and tuning forks throughout the session. By accommodating the client's preferences while also providing them with evidence-based recommendations, we fostered a collaborative and trusting relationship, leading to a successful therapy session and positive outcomes.